Is Paganism About to be Redefined from the Parliament?

In the world of Interfaith relations, where religions, faiths and traditions seek to find cooperation and peaceful coexistence, the labels and definitions and how they are used are important. Descriptions of faith practices are the way interfaith speakers share information that leads to greater understanding, and the clearer the language used, the better chance all parties will be able to find common ground. In this case, for a very long time Paganism has been defined by the Christian definition of any non-Abrahamic religion. This has been considered a derogatory term by many faiths, and seen as insult to many including members of Hinduism, Buddhism, Native and Indigenous faiths. They each desired that they be seen as an equal religion with their own title and definitions to be used. In this, by agreement, Paganism is not used to directly describe any faith simply because it is not Christian, Muslim, or Jewish. This agreement has allowed each faith attending to put aside the use of this word as a central description of their faith.

So the term Pagan itself is being redefined from this old Christian based definition. Part of the Teaching of Traditions series, created with the help of Pagan Trustees, describes Paganism as follows: “Paganism” is a collective term that most aptly defines Indigenous cultures of pre-Christian Europe, the Celtic and Germanic Tribes, The Balts, The Scandinavians, The Basques, The Slaves and many others.

The first Pagan presentation of the Parliament helped begin this change of identity and was called “People Call Us Pagans-The European Indigenous Traditions”, by PWR Trustees Angie Buchanan, Andras Arthen, and Phyllis Curott. The opening of the description is as follows: As the World confronts environmental devastation, we are beginning to appreciate the wisdom of Indigenous peoples who have lived thousands of years in sustainable harmony and spiritual connection with the Earth. After hundreds of years of suppression, most Westerners have forgotten that their ancestors once shared this wisdom as the Indigenous traditions of Europe. *

This concept of Paganism as being based deeply in European Indigenous Traditions has fascinated and found ground among American, European and Australian members of the Parliament. It helps move Paganism from being a New Religious Movement to an Indigenous tradition, and offers many more opportunities to reach out at the parliament.

As described by Andras Corban-Arthen most forms of modern Paganism can be described as part of the New Religious Movements as they were formed in the 20th century, yet there are several Pagan ethnic traditions that have survived Christianization. One such example is Romuva of Lithuania. It is these ethnic traditions that fit better into the description of Indigenous traditions, instead of New Religious Movements. It allows Pagans to be part of both New Religious Movements and also recognized as part of the Indigenous traditions. By accepting that Pagan Traditions are indigenous to Europe, then individuals must take another look and it presents them with a different paradigm of what Pagan stands for.

Further, Andras Corban-Arthen points out that Wicca, for example, cannot be seen as an indigenous Pagan faith practice and is instead a modern syncretic movement. Under this description Wicca therefore would not fall under the definition of Pagan, and would be squarely a New Religious Movement, while British Traditional Witchcraft could be considered a Pagan and Indigenous faith tradition.

This concept of redefining Paganism as Indigenous Faith Practices of Europe has been seen as a way to change perceptions. River Higginbotham, Author and Pagan, who has heard this definition for the first time at the Parliament, describes this change as one that will benefit many Pagans, and he accepts that most Pagans he knows draw on European traditions to form their own practices. This allows them grounding in culture, and this description has given them a better understanding of where their faith is coming from.

Angie Buchanan offers that recognition of Paganism as an extension of the faith practice of Indigenous European Religions gives modern Pagans grounding in their own traditions. This will help them find their own customs and rituals. This will discourage modern Pagans from raiding other Indigenous faiths rituals and practices, which is also known as Cultural Appropriation, which many Native Americans and other culturally based ceremonialists describe as a form of spiritual theft. By having Pagans focus on their own European roots, they can avoid creating situations that would aggravate cultural appropriation that harms interfaith efforts.

Linda Hart, Interfaith Liaison for Pagan Awareness Network of Australia, feels this is a good description for Paganism, and finds it useful for non-Pagans to understand. It is a useful tool in dealing with other indigenous faiths, which do not see themselves as Pagan. Instead this allows Pagans to share as fellow Earth-Based Spiritualists.

So we see that Paganism is beginning to be used to describe Indigenous European faiths, and that other practices by Indigenous people are being seen as part of a larger family of Earth-Based Spiritualists; That some forms of what we call Paganism are really independent of that term and are better described their own name under New Religious Movements.

In all cases, the definition that Pagans are those who practice a faith not covered by Christianity, Judaism, or Islam, should be discarded as politically and socially unacceptable. That we must look beyond a definition forced onto the world by missionaries as a way to divide us, and instead accept that each faith practice can and should be called by the name of their choice.

For many self-described Pagans, this is a different lens to view themselves with, and offers a chance to reexamine their faith as Pagans, Earth Spiritualists, New Religious Movements, or something else yet to come. It may be time to examine the entire Pagan movement under this new definition and allow it to evolve into more than simply one community; that understanding these differences and the labels they generate can allow us to interact more fully in a multi-religious and pluralistic Interfaith World, as shown at the Parliament of World’s Religions.

*PWR Program Handbook, 2009, pg.142-143

Tags: balts, celtic, europe, germanic, indigenous, pagan, paganism, parliament, redefining, religion, More…scandinavians, world

Views: 13

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Are there any Ásatrú there at the Parliament? I am guessing there is not any there.

Most Ásatrú I have met and socialized with much prefer the term Heathen. They follow the Nine Noble Virtues.

Much like referring to a Hindu is a "Pagan", to many it is not the most correct term/usage.

May She Give You Grace

No, Atatru,no Heathens, as they do not yet have either the resources or inclination to deal with Interfaith.
There is still a good deal of issues Asatru has on its own before it can mature to that level. The largest one I can think of is the folkish versus what is termed the universalist approach. In other words, the folkish view is more exclusive towards those of Indo-European stock and descent, as opposed to letting someone join based on a spiritual calling from another culture and/or racial background.

With there being several groups out there ranging from the Odinic Rite to the Asatru Folk Assembly, it may be a while before we see any members of this group at the P.W.R. We can hope to see them there someday.

In my humble opinion however, I believe that regardless of whether the group or kindred is folkish or universalist, that many Heathens or Asatruar simply wish to keep to themselves and not worry over their relationships with other faiths. At least not in the sense of the P.W.R. It may be different if they shared space within a city or something, but that's dealing with living space and not world issues dealing with religion.
When I first read this post, which was cross-posted on the various Correllian Yahoo Forums, it boggled my mind, and it is still boggling my mind.

I think at the end of the day a lot of Wiccans and other 20th-century 'revival-type' religions will be uproarious about being shoved into such a narrow box as "New Religious Movement"!

Bottom line, for now anyway, until I can wrap my mind on the absurdity of this -- I am PAGAN and I am PROUD of this FACT. And I will not, as someone on the pagans-at-parliament blog said, be "defined out" of my beliefs.

So, people, come on, this has to get your pants on fire, what say you? What say you?
"No, Atatru,no Heathens, as they do not yet have either the resources or inclination to deal with Interfaith."
Is this a known fact, or supposition/theory on someone's part?

If they are not there, do not paint them with with the "Pagan" brush.

Their absence is not permission to place a "Label" on them, that they may not care for or tolerate.

Give them the respect, that we ourselves are seeking.

If you lack the "Google Fu" to find the various Ásatrú web sites etc, I can render some assistance. Go there, post what is going on there in the Land of Oz. Some of the Kindred web sites are fairly easy to gain posting access to.

I find the attempt to place a "Label" on what I do or do not believe, to be another example of Wrong Thick Headedness.

May She Give You Grace


This is always interesting to see this reaction. I have direct knowledge about this, and of course, not all groups or even all titles or labels, but the largest groups did lack the resources to make it here. In fact, many groups lacked the resources. As for inclination, some of these groups feel they have enough on their plates and do not see the value of Interfaith dialogue. The truth is very small amounts of Pagan groups feel that Interfaith Dialogue has value, and instead focus on their own development or working with rights group.

I appreciate the comments, and the question.
I am not angry, I have not said our delegates have done anything wrong either.

But I do not view it as Nit Picking. Attempting to get accurate information is not always a bad thing.

But it seems we agree to disagree.

May She Give You Grace

OK thanks for the information. Call me a doubting Thomas can you give more details on this direct knowledge?

Since we are on a digital from of communication, can you please give some signature etc.

But back to my statements.

"If they are not there, do not paint them with with the "Pagan" brush."

"Their absence is not permission to place a "Label" on them, that they may not care for or tolerate."

May She Give You Grace

Tomorrow there will be more on Wild Hunt Blog.
This "European Indigenous" talk certainly isn't new with this Parliament. But some of us say, yes, we follow an indigenous tradition.... but we American Wiccans are not an indigenous people. We support the struggles of the indigenous people - fighting colonialism, dealing with government(s) claiming their land, reclaiming stolen generations brought up in government schools, etc. But those aren't fights that most of us face ourselves. We do fight religious persecution, esp. in custody battles, but it really isn't the same.

OTOH, I really don't mind the New Religious Movement designation either. When I was in the session Understanding Vodun: a West African Spirituality by Robert Houndohome Hounon of Benin and listened to his apparent belief that the Diaspora was all wrong and those seeking the Orixa should come get the "pure religion from one of the countries of the Gulf of Guinea." And his assertion that Vodun is anti-abortion. It made me glad that my own relationship with the Orixa come through the NRM of Umbanda. And that no African "King" is in a position to tell me what my stance as a modern woman should be on abortion!

And for the record, the Asatruar folk have been involved in Interfaith, especially in the North American Interfaith Network and in the United Religions Initiative. There may have been a representative in Barcelona at that Parliament though I am not certain.
Thank You....I know our people here want to know more about Asatru as a whole. We are a very synergetic folk around her who love to read. I appreciate you commenting.
And yet, it was with great pride that the King Robert Houndohome Hounon was sponsored by the Pagan Community, to spread a message of purity of faith. It is exactly the same Indigenous argument that Andras Arthen made for European traditions. This is not what I think of when I think of Pagan faiths, but I am being told by many of the older leaders that is exactly what is intended and was intended all along.

Thank you for pointing that out.




  • Add Videos
  • View All

© 2014   Created by Witch School.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service